The causes of welfare state expansion: deindustrialization or globalization?

Arbeitspapier

An influential line of argument holds that trade exposure causes economic uncertainty and spurs popular demands for compensatory and risk-sharing welfare state spending. The argument has gained renewed prominence through the recent work of Garrett (1998) and Rodrik (1997; 1998). This paper argues that the relationship between trade openness and welfare state expansion is spurious, and that the engine of welfare state expansion since the 1960s has been deindustrialization. Based on cross-sectional time-series data for 15 OECD countries we show that there is no relationship between trade exposure and the level of labor market risks (in terms of employment and wages), whereas the uncertainty and dislocations caused by deindustrialization have spurred electoral demands for compensating welfare state policies. Yet, while differential rates of deindustrialization explain differences in the overall size of the welfare state, its particular character -- in terms of the share of direct government provision and the equality of transfer payments -- is shaped by government partisanship. The argument has implications for the study, and the future, of the welfare state that are very different from those suggestedin the trade openness literature.

Object Details

• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Series: WZB Discussion Paper ; No. FS I 98-304

Classification and Topics

• Classification: Wirtschaft
• Subject: Sozialstaat ; Staatsquote ; Globalisierung ; Deindustrialisierung ; Außenhandelsliberalisierung ; Strukturwandel ; OECD-Staaten

Contributors, Places and Time

• Event: Geistige Schöpfung
• (who): Iversen, Torben ; Cusack, Thomas R.
• Event: Veröffentlichung
• (who): Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB)
• (where): Berlin
• (when): 1998

Further information

• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44094
• Last update: 10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET