Bericht
Cost allocation in investment arbitration: Forward toward incentivization
In allocating costs in investment treaty arbitration, a "loser-pays" principle would incentivize economically-rational behavior by parties, including when deciding whether to bring a claim and/or settle. This principle would promote greater efficiency in investment treaty arbitration.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Columbia FDI Perspectives ; No. 123
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Nicholson, James
Gaffney, John
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
- (where)
-
New York, NY
- (when)
-
2014
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:41 AM CET
Data provider
This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Bericht
Associated
- Nicholson, James
- Gaffney, John
- Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
Time of origin
- 2014
Other Objects (12)
Cost allocation in investment arbitration: Back toward diversification
International investment arbitration: winning, losing and why
Corruption and Illegality in Asian Investment Arbitration
Cost allocation in ICSID arbitration: theory and (mis)application
Toward arbitration between subnational units and foreign investors?
An opportunity to reimagine investment arbitration in Beijing
Burden of Proof in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Shifting?
The (lack of) women arbitrators in investment treaty arbitration
International investment, protection and arbitration : theoretical and practical perspectives
The case against third-party funding in investment arbitration
Institutional entrepreneurship and the forgotten origins of investment treaty arbitration
Investment protection, human rights, and international arbitration in extraordinary times
Cost allocation in investment arbitration: Back toward diversification
International investment arbitration: winning, losing and why
Corruption and Illegality in Asian Investment Arbitration
Cost allocation in ICSID arbitration: theory and (mis)application
Toward arbitration between subnational units and foreign investors?
An opportunity to reimagine investment arbitration in Beijing
Burden of Proof in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Shifting?
The (lack of) women arbitrators in investment treaty arbitration
International investment, protection and arbitration : theoretical and practical perspectives
The case against third-party funding in investment arbitration
Institutional entrepreneurship and the forgotten origins of investment treaty arbitration
Investment protection, human rights, and international arbitration in extraordinary times
Cost allocation in investment arbitration: Back toward diversification
International investment arbitration: winning, losing and why
Corruption and Illegality in Asian Investment Arbitration
Cost allocation in ICSID arbitration: theory and (mis)application
Toward arbitration between subnational units and foreign investors?
An opportunity to reimagine investment arbitration in Beijing
Burden of Proof in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Shifting?
The (lack of) women arbitrators in investment treaty arbitration
International investment, protection and arbitration : theoretical and practical perspectives
The case against third-party funding in investment arbitration
Institutional entrepreneurship and the forgotten origins of investment treaty arbitration