Bericht
An opportunity to reimagine investment arbitration in Beijing
This Perspective argues that two global, Beijing-based institutions - the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the International Commercial Dispute Prevention and Settlement Organization - have an opportunity to contribute to the development of a Beijing-based international investment dispute resolution hub.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Columbia FDI Perspectives ; No. 353
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Feldman, Mark
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
- (where)
-
New York, NY
- (when)
-
2023
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET
Data provider
This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Bericht
Associated
- Feldman, Mark
- Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
Time of origin
- 2023
Other Objects (12)
International investment arbitration: winning, losing and why
Cost allocation in investment arbitration: Forward toward incentivization
Cost allocation in investment arbitration: Back toward diversification
The (lack of) women arbitrators in investment treaty arbitration
The case against third-party funding in investment arbitration
Explaining the rise of third-party funding in investment arbitration
State-controlled entities as claimants in international investment arbitration: an early assessment
Legitimacy in WTO law and investment arbitration: the role of the contracting parties
Investment arbitration liability insurance: a possible solution for concerns of a regulatory chill?
Legitimizing expectations in arbitration through political risk analysis
Toward arbitration between subnational units and foreign investors?
Beijing is haunted by Olympic ghosts
International investment arbitration: winning, losing and why
Cost allocation in investment arbitration: Forward toward incentivization
Cost allocation in investment arbitration: Back toward diversification
The (lack of) women arbitrators in investment treaty arbitration
The case against third-party funding in investment arbitration
Explaining the rise of third-party funding in investment arbitration
State-controlled entities as claimants in international investment arbitration: an early assessment
Legitimacy in WTO law and investment arbitration: the role of the contracting parties
Investment arbitration liability insurance: a possible solution for concerns of a regulatory chill?
Legitimizing expectations in arbitration through political risk analysis
Toward arbitration between subnational units and foreign investors?
Beijing is haunted by Olympic ghosts
International investment arbitration: winning, losing and why
Cost allocation in investment arbitration: Forward toward incentivization
Cost allocation in investment arbitration: Back toward diversification
The (lack of) women arbitrators in investment treaty arbitration
The case against third-party funding in investment arbitration
Explaining the rise of third-party funding in investment arbitration
State-controlled entities as claimants in international investment arbitration: an early assessment
Legitimacy in WTO law and investment arbitration: the role of the contracting parties
Investment arbitration liability insurance: a possible solution for concerns of a regulatory chill?
Legitimizing expectations in arbitration through political risk analysis
Toward arbitration between subnational units and foreign investors?