Arbeitspapier
Does unfairness hurt women? The effects of losing unfair competitions
How do men and women differ in their persistence after experiencing failure in a competitive environment? We tackle this question by combining a large online experiment (N=2,086) with machine learning. We find that when losing is unequivocally due to merit, both men and women exhibit a significant decrease in subsequent tournament entry. However, when the prior tournament is unfair, i.e., a loss is no longer necessarily based on merit, women are more discouraged than men. These results suggest that transparent meritocratic criteria may play a key role in preventing women from falling behind after experiencing a loss.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: Working Papers in Economics and Statistics ; No. 2023-11
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Design of Experiments: General
Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making‡
Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
- Thema
-
Competitiveness
Gender
Fairness
Machine learning
Online experiment
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Piasenti, Stefano
Valente, Marica
van Veldhuizen, Roel
Pfeifer, Gregor
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
University of Innsbruck, Research Platform Empirical and Experimental Economics (eeecon)
- (wo)
-
Innsbruck
- (wann)
-
2023
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Piasenti, Stefano
- Valente, Marica
- van Veldhuizen, Roel
- Pfeifer, Gregor
- University of Innsbruck, Research Platform Empirical and Experimental Economics (eeecon)
Entstanden
- 2023