Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials – a systematic survey

to related objects

Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main

ISSN: 1472-6904

Extent: Online-Ressource

Language: Englisch

Notes: online resource.

Bibliographic citation: Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials – a systematic survey ; volume:1 ; number:1 ; day:12 ; month:9 ; year:2001 ; pages:1-6 ; date:12.2001
BMC clinical pharmacology ; 1, Heft 1 (12.9.2001), 1-6, 12.2001

Creator: Loke, Yoon Kong

Contributor: Derry, Sheena
SpringerLink (Online service)

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6904-1-3

URN: urn:nbn:de:1111-2016072029676

Rights: Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.

Last update: 14.08.2025, 10:50 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Show original at data provider

Associated

Loke, Yoon Kong
Derry, Sheena
SpringerLink (Online service)

Other Objects (12)

Adverse event reporting in randomised trials of neuropathic pain: challenges for clinical usefulness of safety data

Comparing physicians’ and patients’ reporting on adverse reactions in randomized trials on acupuncture—a secondary data analysis

Combining Social Media and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System to Detect Adverse Drug Reactions

Prospective reporting of statistical analysis plans for randomised controlled trials

Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases

Aufsatzsammlung

Adverse drug reactions

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials of massage

The quality of reporting in cluster randomised crossover trials: proposal for reporting items and an assessment of reporting quality

Attitudes among healthcare professionals to the reporting of adverse drug reactions in Nepal

Inadequate reporting of sample size calculations in cluster randomised trials: a review

Adverse event reporting in randomised trials of neuropathic pain: challenges for clinical usefulness of safety data

Comparing physicians’ and patients’ reporting on adverse reactions in randomized trials on acupuncture—a secondary data analysis

Combining Social Media and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System to Detect Adverse Drug Reactions

Prospective reporting of statistical analysis plans for randomised controlled trials

Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases

Aufsatzsammlung

Adverse drug reactions

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials of massage

The quality of reporting in cluster randomised crossover trials: proposal for reporting items and an assessment of reporting quality

Attitudes among healthcare professionals to the reporting of adverse drug reactions in Nepal

Inadequate reporting of sample size calculations in cluster randomised trials: a review

Adverse event reporting in randomised trials of neuropathic pain: challenges for clinical usefulness of safety data

Comparing physicians’ and patients’ reporting on adverse reactions in randomized trials on acupuncture—a secondary data analysis

Combining Social Media and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System to Detect Adverse Drug Reactions

Prospective reporting of statistical analysis plans for randomised controlled trials

Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases

Aufsatzsammlung

Adverse drug reactions

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials of massage

The quality of reporting in cluster randomised crossover trials: proposal for reporting items and an assessment of reporting quality

Attitudes among healthcare professionals to the reporting of adverse drug reactions in Nepal

Inadequate reporting of sample size calculations in cluster randomised trials: a review

Cultural heritage institutions wishing to register will find more information here.

Fields marked * need to be filled in.

Username*

Please enter your username

Email*

Please enter your email address

Please do not fill this field

First name

Last name

Password*

Please enter your password

Confirm password*

Please enter the same password

I have read the terms of use and the privacy policy for the collection of personal data and accept them. *

This field is required.

I would like to subscribe to the newsletter of the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek. See newsletter subscription info.

Account created

Your "My DDB" account has been successfully created. Before you can log in to your account, you must click the confirmation link in the message we just sent to the email address you provided.

Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials – a systematic survey

Object Details

References and Relationships

Contributors, Places and Time

Further information

Data provider

Associated

Other Objects (12)

Adverse event reporting in randomised trials of neuropathic pain: challenges for clinical usefulness of safety data

Comparing physicians’ and patients’ reporting on adverse reactions in randomized trials on acupuncture—a secondary data analysis

Combining Social Media and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System to Detect Adverse Drug Reactions

Prospective reporting of statistical analysis plans for randomised controlled trials

Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases

Adverse drug reactions

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials of massage

The quality of reporting in cluster randomised crossover trials: proposal for reporting items and an assessment of reporting quality

Attitudes among healthcare professionals to the reporting of adverse drug reactions in Nepal

Inadequate reporting of sample size calculations in cluster randomised trials: a review

Adverse event reporting in randomised trials of neuropathic pain: challenges for clinical usefulness of safety data

Comparing physicians’ and patients’ reporting on adverse reactions in randomized trials on acupuncture—a secondary data analysis

Combining Social Media and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System to Detect Adverse Drug Reactions

Prospective reporting of statistical analysis plans for randomised controlled trials

Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases

Adverse drug reactions

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials of massage

The quality of reporting in cluster randomised crossover trials: proposal for reporting items and an assessment of reporting quality

Attitudes among healthcare professionals to the reporting of adverse drug reactions in Nepal

Inadequate reporting of sample size calculations in cluster randomised trials: a review

Adverse event reporting in randomised trials of neuropathic pain: challenges for clinical usefulness of safety data

Comparing physicians’ and patients’ reporting on adverse reactions in randomized trials on acupuncture—a secondary data analysis

Combining Social Media and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System to Detect Adverse Drug Reactions

Prospective reporting of statistical analysis plans for randomised controlled trials

Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases

Adverse drug reactions

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials of massage

The quality of reporting in cluster randomised crossover trials: proposal for reporting items and an assessment of reporting quality

Attitudes among healthcare professionals to the reporting of adverse drug reactions in Nepal

Inadequate reporting of sample size calculations in cluster randomised trials: a review

Related objects

Reset password