Deglobalisation and Protectionism

Arbeitspapier

Trade in goods has slowed markedly since the global financial crisis (GFC), but there is no deglobalisation: most countries have seen increased international integration across nearly all goods, services and factor markets. China has become more self-reliant and is a notable exception in goods trade. Despite some dramatic instances, protectionism has largely been kept at bay and trade in goods remains quite free, perhaps freer than it was before the GFC. The proliferation and deepening of free trade agreements have contributed to this outcome. There has been deglobalisation of capital markets, but not because of protectionism. Despite efforts to erect barriers in some sensitive sectors, technology flows quite freely across borders because of the internet. However, trade policy uncertainty increased after the election of President Trump, a trend that persists under President Biden, and the biggest challenge is to avoid backsliding. There are many missed opportunities in the globalisation of services and of capital flows - especially those to developing countries. Increased migration remains potentially the largest source of gain from globalisation, but it is also the most fraught politically.

Show object

• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Series: Bruegel Working Paper ; No. 18/2022

Classification and Topics

• Classification: Wirtschaft

Contributors, Places and Time

• Event: Geistige Schöpfung
• (who): Dadush, Uri
• Event: Veröffentlichung
• (who): Bruegel
• (where): Brussels
• (when): 2022

Further information

• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/274177