Arbeitspapier

Pricing Pollution

I examine a policy-making game among countries that must choose both a policy instrument (e.g., a tax or a quota) and its intensity (i.e., the tax rate or the quota level) to price pollution. When countries price pollution non-cooperatively, they not only set the intensity inefficiently, they are also likely to adopt Pigouvian fees, despite quotas being better from a welfare perspective. Adopting a Pigouvian fee to address a multi-country externality generates a risk externality, and non-cooperatively chosen quotas can generate higher social welfare than maximum social welfare Pigouvian fees can deliver.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: CESifo Working Paper ; No. 8269

Classification
Wirtschaft
Noncooperative Games
Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy: General
Taxation and Subsidies: Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation: Government Policy
Environmental Economics: Government Policy
Subject
environmental policy
global pollution
international relations

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Mideksa, Torben K.
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)
(where)
Munich
(when)
2020

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Mideksa, Torben K.
  • Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)

Time of origin

  • 2020

Other Objects (12)