Arbeitspapier
Measuring skill and chance in games
Online and offline gaming has become a multi-billion dollar industry.However, games of chance are prohibited or tightly regulated in many jurisdictions. Thus, the question whether a game predominantly depends on skill or chance has important legal and regulatory implications. In this paper, we suggest a new empirical criterion for distinguishing games of skill from games of chance: All players are ranked according to a "best-fit" Elo algorithm. The wider the distribution of player ratings are in a game, the more important is the role of skill. Most importantly, we provide a new benchmark ("50%-chess") that allows to decide whether games predominantly (more than 50%) depend on chance, as this criterion is often used by courts. We apply the method to large datasets of various two-player games (e.g. chess, poker, backgammon, tetris). Our findings indicate that most popular online games, including poker, are below the threshold of 50% skill and thus depend pre-dominantly on chance. In fact, poker contains about as much skill as chess when 3 out of 4 chess games are replaced by a coin flip.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Discussion Paper Series ; No. 643
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism
Noncooperative Games
- Subject
-
ELO
ranking
games of skill
games of chance
chess
poker
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Duersch, Peter
Lambrecht, Marco
Oechssler, Joerg
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics
- (where)
-
Heidelberg
- (when)
-
2017
- DOI
-
doi:10.11588/heidok.00023867
- Handle
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-238671
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET
Data provider
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Arbeitspapier
Associated
- Duersch, Peter
- Lambrecht, Marco
- Oechssler, Joerg
- University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics
Time of origin
- 2017