Arbeitspapier
Asymmetric dominance effect with multiple decoys for low- and high-variance lotteries
The asymmetric dominance effect refers to the phenomenon according to which the choice probability of an alternative increases when an inferior alternative - the decoy - is included into the choice set. The objective of this experimental study is twofold. First, we investigate the asymmetric dominance effect on two-outcome lotteries with almost equal expected values. We find that the impact of a decoy on low-variance lotteries (LVLs) is much higher than on high-variance lotteries (HVLs). Second, we examine the asymmetric dominance effect in the presence of two decoys. While the asymmetric dominance effect persists when the choice set includes two decoys, the effect is not always further enhanced compared to the setting with one decoy and again much stronger for LVLs than for HVLs. Controlling for subjects' degrees of risk aversion, we find support for consistency between individual risk preferences and choice behavior among the lotteries. However, we observe decoy effects of equal strength irrespective of the subjects' degree of risk aversion. Thus, our analysis indicates that to a substantial extent the presence of decoys subtly makes decision-makers choose against their risk preferences by favoring lotteries that entail risks contrary to their elicited individual risk-taking profile.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers ; No. 574
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
- Thema
-
Asymmetric dominance effect
decoy effects
multiple decoys
risk aversion
individual decision making
experimental economics
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Sürücü, Oktay
Brangewitz, Sonja
Djawadi, Behnud Mir
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Bielefeld University, Center for Mathematical Economics (IMW)
- (wo)
-
Bielefeld
- (wann)
-
2017
- Handle
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:0070-pub-29106712
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:43 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Sürücü, Oktay
- Brangewitz, Sonja
- Djawadi, Behnud Mir
- Bielefeld University, Center for Mathematical Economics (IMW)
Entstanden
- 2017
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Asymmetric dominance effect with multiple decoys for low- and high-variance lotteries
Asymmetric dominance effects in choice experiments and contingent valuation
International diversification versus domestic diversification: Mean-variance portfolio optimization and stochastic dominance approaches
A new method aimed at using the dominance variance in closed breeding populations
Persistence or decay of strategic asymmetric dominance in repeated dyadic games?
Relationships among estimates of inbreeding depression, dominance and additive variance for linear traits in Holsteins
Darstellung und Vergleich des "Mean-Variance"- und des "Stochastic-Dominance"-Ansatzes für die Zusammenstellung von Wertpapierdepots
Portfolios dominating indices: Optimization with second-order stochastic dominance constraints vs. minimum and mean variance portfolios
Darstellung und Vergleich des "Mean-Variance"- und des "Stochastic-Dominance"-Ansatzes für die Zusammenstellung von Wertpapierdepots
GVCBLUP: a computer package for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects
Do REITs outperform stocks and fixed-income assets? New evidence from mean-variance and stochastic dominance approaches
Asymmetric Synthesis of Tetrahydrofurans Bearing Multiple Stereocenters
Asymmetric dominance effect with multiple decoys for low- and high-variance lotteries
Asymmetric dominance effects in choice experiments and contingent valuation
International diversification versus domestic diversification: Mean-variance portfolio optimization and stochastic dominance approaches
A new method aimed at using the dominance variance in closed breeding populations
Persistence or decay of strategic asymmetric dominance in repeated dyadic games?
Relationships among estimates of inbreeding depression, dominance and additive variance for linear traits in Holsteins
Darstellung und Vergleich des "Mean-Variance"- und des "Stochastic-Dominance"-Ansatzes für die Zusammenstellung von Wertpapierdepots
Portfolios dominating indices: Optimization with second-order stochastic dominance constraints vs. minimum and mean variance portfolios
Darstellung und Vergleich des "Mean-Variance"- und des "Stochastic-Dominance"-Ansatzes für die Zusammenstellung von Wertpapierdepots
GVCBLUP: a computer package for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects
Do REITs outperform stocks and fixed-income assets? New evidence from mean-variance and stochastic dominance approaches
Asymmetric Synthesis of Tetrahydrofurans Bearing Multiple Stereocenters
Asymmetric dominance effect with multiple decoys for low- and high-variance lotteries
Asymmetric dominance effects in choice experiments and contingent valuation
International diversification versus domestic diversification: Mean-variance portfolio optimization and stochastic dominance approaches
A new method aimed at using the dominance variance in closed breeding populations
Persistence or decay of strategic asymmetric dominance in repeated dyadic games?
Relationships among estimates of inbreeding depression, dominance and additive variance for linear traits in Holsteins
Darstellung und Vergleich des "Mean-Variance"- und des "Stochastic-Dominance"-Ansatzes für die Zusammenstellung von Wertpapierdepots
Portfolios dominating indices: Optimization with second-order stochastic dominance constraints vs. minimum and mean variance portfolios
Darstellung und Vergleich des "Mean-Variance"- und des "Stochastic-Dominance"-Ansatzes für die Zusammenstellung von Wertpapierdepots
GVCBLUP: a computer package for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects
Do REITs outperform stocks and fixed-income assets? New evidence from mean-variance and stochastic dominance approaches