Comment | Stellungnahme
Extraterritorial U.S. sanctions: only domestic courts could effectively curb the enforcement of U.S. law abroad
The long reach of U.S. law affects persons, property, and acts around the world. In trying to shield EU-based individuals and entities with commercial interests from its adverse impact, European policy-makers have recently been exposed as more or less helpless. In order to pursue their strategic objectives more effectively, Europeans must not only focus on increasing strategic autonomy vis-à-vis the U.S. government. Absent a diplomatic agreement with the executive branch, they must also better utilize available channels of influence. One potential avenue would be to substantially support EU-based companies in domestic courts -both diplomatically as well as financially- in order to challenge the executive branch when enforcing U.S. law beyond borders. Only the judicial branch can effectively curb the extraterritorial application of U.S. jurisdiction. (author's abstract)
- ISSN
-
1861-1761
- Umfang
-
Seite(n): 8
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet
- Erschienen in
-
SWP Comment (5/2019)
- Thema
-
Recht
Internationale Beziehungen
Recht
internationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitik
Handelshemmnis
Freihandel
Globalisierung
transatlantische Beziehungen
EU
internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen
Sanktion
Außenhandelspolitik
internationales Recht
Governance
USA
Außenpolitik
internationale Beziehungen
Wirtschaft
Gerichtsverfahren
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Lohmann, Sascha
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit
- (wo)
-
Deutschland, Berlin
- (wann)
-
2019
- DOI
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-61664-8
- Rechteinformation
-
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
21.06.2024, 16:27 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Stellungnahme
Beteiligte
- Lohmann, Sascha
- Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit
Entstanden
- 2019
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Extraterritorial U.S. sanctions: Only domestic courts could effectively curb the enforcement of U.S. law abroad
Extraterritorial U.S. sanctions: only domestic courts could effectively curb the enforcement of U.S. law abroad
Extraterritorial U.S. sanctions : only domestic courts could effectively curb the enforcement of U.S. law abroad
Toughening Financial Sanctions on Russia: Enforcing Energy Sanctions and Reducing Shadow Reserves Effectively
Easing US and EU Sanctions on Iran
The Lawfulness of Unilateral Sanctions in the Wake of a US–China “Sanctions War”
Has the U.S. Supreme Court Effectively Overruled Roe v. Wade?
Easing the curb
Grenzenlose Jurisdiktion? : Die völkerrechtliche Zulässigkeit von US-Sekundärsanktionen (Secondary Sanctions)
Biased Coercion : The Imposition, Management, and Termination of US Sanctions
International sanctions as social action: understanding the use of unilateral U.S. sanctions against Iran, 1979-2013
Has U.S. Investment Abroad Become More Sensitive to Tax Rates?
Extraterritorial U.S. sanctions: Only domestic courts could effectively curb the enforcement of U.S. law abroad
Extraterritorial U.S. sanctions: only domestic courts could effectively curb the enforcement of U.S. law abroad
Extraterritorial U.S. sanctions : only domestic courts could effectively curb the enforcement of U.S. law abroad
Toughening Financial Sanctions on Russia: Enforcing Energy Sanctions and Reducing Shadow Reserves Effectively
Easing US and EU Sanctions on Iran
The Lawfulness of Unilateral Sanctions in the Wake of a US–China “Sanctions War”
Has the U.S. Supreme Court Effectively Overruled Roe v. Wade?
Easing the curb
Grenzenlose Jurisdiktion? : Die völkerrechtliche Zulässigkeit von US-Sekundärsanktionen (Secondary Sanctions)
Biased Coercion : The Imposition, Management, and Termination of US Sanctions
International sanctions as social action: understanding the use of unilateral U.S. sanctions against Iran, 1979-2013
Has U.S. Investment Abroad Become More Sensitive to Tax Rates?
Extraterritorial U.S. sanctions: Only domestic courts could effectively curb the enforcement of U.S. law abroad
Extraterritorial U.S. sanctions: only domestic courts could effectively curb the enforcement of U.S. law abroad
Extraterritorial U.S. sanctions : only domestic courts could effectively curb the enforcement of U.S. law abroad
Toughening Financial Sanctions on Russia: Enforcing Energy Sanctions and Reducing Shadow Reserves Effectively
Easing US and EU Sanctions on Iran
The Lawfulness of Unilateral Sanctions in the Wake of a US–China “Sanctions War”
Has the U.S. Supreme Court Effectively Overruled Roe v. Wade?
Easing the curb
Grenzenlose Jurisdiktion? : Die völkerrechtliche Zulässigkeit von US-Sekundärsanktionen (Secondary Sanctions)
Biased Coercion : The Imposition, Management, and Termination of US Sanctions
International sanctions as social action: understanding the use of unilateral U.S. sanctions against Iran, 1979-2013