Artikel

Incentivizing efficient utilization without reducing access: The case against cost‐sharing in insurance

Cost-sharing is regarded as an important tool to reduce moral hazard in health insurance. Contrary to standard prediction, however, such requirements are found to decrease utilization both of efficient and of inefficient care. I employ a simple model that incorporates two possible explanations—consumer mistakes and limited access—to assess the welfare implications of different insurance designs. I find cost-sharing never to be an optimal solution as it produces two novel inefficiencies by limiting access. An alternative design, relying on bonuses, has no such side effects and achieves the same incentivization. I show how the optimal design can be deduced empirically and discuss possible impediments to its implementation.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Journal: Health Economics ; ISSN: 1099-1050 ; Volume: 29 ; Year: 2020 ; Issue: 7 ; Pages: 827-840 ; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley

Classification
Wirtschaft
Subject
cost‐sharing
insurance rebates
limited access
moral hazard

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Fels, Markus
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Wiley
(where)
Hoboken, NJ
(when)
2020

DOI
doi:10.1002/hec.4023
Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:45 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Artikel

Associated

  • Fels, Markus
  • Wiley

Time of origin

  • 2020

Other Objects (12)