Arbeitspapier

How will the court decide? Tax experts and the estimation of tax risk

Tax accounting and tax law concern the probability thresholds that can require the taxpayer to estimate the likelihood that a tax position would be upheld by a court. Tax complexity and the consequent ambiguity results in a reliance by most taxpayers on a tax expert estimate of this likelihood. This study examines whether the tax experts are able to accurately forecast the outcome of tax court decisions and compares tax expert predictions to those of laymen. Our results reveal no significant differences with respect to the forecasting performance of professional tax advisors and laymen. Moreover, the tax advisors exhibit a significantly higher level of overconfidence compared to laymen and the degree of overconfidence increases with professional experience. A comparison of two groups of tax experts, tax advisors and revenue agents demonstrates that the tax advisors exhibit the highest level of overconfidence and form stronger appeal recommendations that indicate a type of advisor bias.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: arqus Discussion Paper ; No. 150

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Accounting and Auditing: General
Regulation and Business Law: General
Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General
Thema
tax risk
overconfidence
client advocacy
tax controversy
forecasting

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Blaufus, Kay
Bob, Jonathan
Trinks, Matthias
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre (arqus)
(wo)
Berlin
(wann)
2013

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Blaufus, Kay
  • Bob, Jonathan
  • Trinks, Matthias
  • Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre (arqus)

Entstanden

  • 2013

Ähnliche Objekte (12)