Konferenzbeitrag
Why is it so difficult to compare treebanks? TIGER and TüBa-D/Z revisited
This paper is a contribution to the ongoing discussion on treebank annotation schemes and their impact on PCFG parsing results. We provide a thorough comparison of two German treebanks: the TIGER treebank and the TüBa-D/Z. We use simple statistics on sentence length and vocabulary size, and more refined methods such as perplexity and its correlation with PCFG parsing results, as well as a Principal Components Analysis. Finally we present a qualitative evaluation of a set of 100 sentences from the TüBa- D/Z, manually annotated in the TIGER as well as in the TüBa-D/Z annotation scheme, and show that even the existence of a parallel subcorpus does not support a straightforward and easy comparison of both annotation schemes.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Thema
-
Korpus <Linguistik>
Syntaktische Analyse
Annotation
Sprache
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Rehbein, Ines
van Genabith, Josef
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Tartu : Northern European Association for Language Technology
- (wann)
-
2017-01-13
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-57822
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
06.03.2025, 09:00 MEZ
Datenpartner
Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache - Bibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Konferenzbeitrag
Beteiligte
- Rehbein, Ines
- van Genabith, Josef
- Tartu : Northern European Association for Language Technology
Entstanden
- 2017-01-13