Arbeitspapier

Should history change the way we think about populism?

This paper asks whether history should change the way in which economists and economic historians think about populism. We use Müller's definition, according to which populism is 'an exclusionary form of identity politics, which is why it poses a threat to democracy'. We make three historical arguments. First, late 19th century US Populists were not populist. Second, there is no necessary relationship between populism and anti-globalization sentiment. Third, economists have sometimes been on the wrong side of important policy debates involving opponents rightly or wrongly described as populist. History encourages us to avoid an overly simplistic view of populism and its correlates.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: QUCEH Working Paper Series ; No. 23-06

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
Economic History: Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation: General, International, or Comparative
Economic History: Transport, International and Domestic Trade, Energy, Technology, and Other Services: General, International, or Comparative
Thema
populism
globalization
economists
history

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
De Bromhead, Alan
O'Rourke, Kevin Hjortshøj
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Queen's University Centre for Economic History (QUCEH)
(wo)
Belfast
(wann)
2023

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:44 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • De Bromhead, Alan
  • O'Rourke, Kevin Hjortshøj
  • Queen's University Centre for Economic History (QUCEH)

Entstanden

  • 2023

Ähnliche Objekte (12)