Artikel

Assessing the extent of strategic manipulation: The average vote example

The average voting procedure reflects the weighted average of expressed opinions in [0,1]. Participants typically behave strategically. We evaluate the discrepancy between the average taste and the average vote. If the population is sufficiently large, it is possible to construct approximations of both the average vote and the average taste which may be readily compared. We construct upper and lower bounds for the limit average vote that depend on the limit average taste. If the average taste is central enough, the range of possible values for the average voting outcome is narrower than the corresponding range for majority voting. For instance, if the average taste is at 1/2, the limit equilibrium outcome is this value plus or minus roughly .2, whereas the weighted median maybe anywhere in the [0,1] interval.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Journal: SERIEs - Journal of the Spanish Economic Association ; ISSN: 1869-4195 ; Volume: 2 ; Year: 2011 ; Issue: 4 ; Pages: 497-513 ; Heidelberg: Springer

Classification
Wirtschaft
Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
Public Goods
Educational Finance; Financial Aid
Subject
average voting
Nash equilibrium
strategic bias
weight
Abstimmungsregel
Nash-Gleichgewicht
Theorie

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Renault, Régis
Trannoy, Alain
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Springer
(where)
Heidelberg
(when)
2011

DOI
doi:10.1007/s13209-011-0077-0
Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:45 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Artikel

Associated

  • Renault, Régis
  • Trannoy, Alain
  • Springer

Time of origin

  • 2011

Other Objects (12)