Arbeitspapier

How should peer-review panels behave?

Many governments wish to assess the quality of their universities. A prominent example is the UK's new Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2014. In the REF, peer-review panels will be provided with information on publications and citations. This paper suggests a way in which panels could choose the weights to attach to these two indicators. The analysis draws in an intuitive way on the concept of Bayesian updating (where citations gradually reveal information about the initially imperfectly-observed importance of the research). Our study should not be interpreted as the argument that only mechanistic measures ought to be used in a REF.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 7024

Classification
Wirtschaft
Higher Education; Research Institutions
Bayesian Analysis: General
Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights: General
Subject
university evaluation
RAE Research Assessment Exercise 2008
citations
bibliometrics
REF 2014 (Research Excellence Framework)
Bayesian methods
Hochschule
Bewertung
Sachverständige
Bibliometrie
Bayes-Statistik
Großbritannien

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Sgroi, Daniel
Oswald, Andrew J.
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
(where)
Bonn
(when)
2012

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Sgroi, Daniel
  • Oswald, Andrew J.
  • Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

Time of origin

  • 2012

Other Objects (12)