Arbeitspapier
How should peer-review panels behave?
Many governments wish to assess the quality of their universities. A prominent example is the UK's new Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2014. In the REF, peer-review panels will be provided with information on publications and citations. This paper suggests a way in which panels could choose the weights to attach to these two indicators. The analysis draws in an intuitive way on the concept of Bayesian updating (where citations gradually reveal information about the initially imperfectly-observed importance of the research). Our study should not be interpreted as the argument that only mechanistic measures ought to be used in a REF.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 7024
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
Higher Education; Research Institutions
Bayesian Analysis: General
Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights: General
- Subject
-
university evaluation
RAE Research Assessment Exercise 2008
citations
bibliometrics
REF 2014 (Research Excellence Framework)
Bayesian methods
Hochschule
Bewertung
Sachverständige
Bibliometrie
Bayes-Statistik
Großbritannien
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Sgroi, Daniel
Oswald, Andrew J.
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
- (where)
-
Bonn
- (when)
-
2012
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET
Data provider
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Arbeitspapier
Associated
- Sgroi, Daniel
- Oswald, Andrew J.
- Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Time of origin
- 2012