Behavioral Constraints on the Design of Subgame-Perfect Implementation Mechanisms

Artikel

We study subgame-perfect implementation (SPI) mechanisms that have been proposed as a solution to incomplete contracting problems. We show that these mechanisms, which are based on off-equilibrium arbitration clauses that impose large fines for lying and the inappropriate use of arbitration, have severe behavioral constraints because the fines induce retaliation against legitimate uses of arbitration. Incorporating reciprocity preferences into the theory explains the observed behavioral patterns and helps us develop a new mechanism that is more robust and achieves high rates of truth-telling and efficiency. Our results highlight the importance of tailoring implementation mechanisms to the underlying behavioral environment. (JEL C92, D44, D82, D86, D91)

Angaben zum Objekt

• Sprache: Englisch

Verweise und Beziehungen

• Erschienen in: Journal: American Economic Review ; ISSN: 1944-7981 ; Volume: 111 ; Year: 2021 ; Issue: 4 ; Pages: 1055-1091 ; Pittsburgh, PA: American Economic Association

Klassifikation und Themen

• Klassifikation: Wirtschaft ; Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior ; Auctions ; Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design ; Economics of Contract: Theory ; Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making‡

Beteiligte, Orts- und Zeitangaben

• Ereignis: Geistige Schöpfung
• (wer): Fehr, Ernst ; Powell, Michael ; Wilkening, Tom
• Ereignis: Veröffentlichung
• (wer): American Economic Association ; ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics
• (wo): Pittsburgh, PA
• (wann): 2021

Weitere Informationen

• DOI: doi:10.1257/aer.20170297
• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/268433
• Letzte Aktualisierung: 10.03.2025, 11:43 MEZ