Arbeitspapier

Should Contractual Clauses that Forbid Renegotiation Always be Enforced?

Recent work in the field of mechanism design has led some researchers to propose institutional changes that would permit parties to enter into nonmodifiable contracts, which is not possible under current contract law. This paper demonstrates that it may well be socially desirable not to enforce contractual terms that explicitly prevent renegotiation, even if rational and symmetrically informed parties have deliberately signed such a contract. The impossibility to prevent renegotiation can constrain the principal’s abilities to introduce distortions in order to reduce the agent’s rent, so that the first-best benchmark solution will more often be attained.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: Bonn Econ Discussion Papers ; No. 26/2005

Classification
Wirtschaft
Contract Law
Subject
Contract modification
Renegotiation
Moral hazard
Vertragstheorie
Vertragsrecht
Moral Hazard
Theorie

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Schmitz, Patrick W.
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE)
(where)
Bonn
(when)
2005

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:44 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Schmitz, Patrick W.
  • University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE)

Time of origin

  • 2005

Other Objects (12)