The EMU Consolidation Game - or: Does 3.0 Really Mean 3.0?

Arbeitspapier

Within the economic profession, it is a widely held view that the fiscal criteria of the Maastricht treaty are arbitrary numbers without economic foundation. Much of this criticism seems to overlook an important aspect - the strategic dimension of the criteria. This paper focuses on one particular question out of this broad strategic complex: How do the criteria change the fiscal bargaining situation on the national level? For this purpose, a bargaining game between a national finance minister and an interest group over budget consolidation is designed. The purpose of this paper is twofold : On the one hand the analysis should contribute to a better understanding of the strategic effects of the fiscal criteria in the pre-EMU period. On the other hand it is to provide insights helpful for the construction of credible and strategically consistent debt limits in the time after the introduction of the Euro.

Angaben zum Objekt

• Sprache: Englisch

Verweise und Beziehungen

• Erschienen in: Series: ZEW Discussion Papers ; No. 98-01

Klassifikation und Themen

• Klassifikation: Wirtschaft ; National Budget, Deficit, and Debt: General ; International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions ; Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior ; Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
• Thema: European Monetary Union ; Convergence Criteria ; Budget Consolidation ; Boundary ; Signalling ; Conditionality ; Europäische Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion ; Haushaltskonsolidierung ; Konvergenzkriterien ; Signalling ; Finanzpolitik ; Interessenpolitik ; Verhandlungen ; Theorie

Beteiligte, Orts- und Zeitangaben

• Ereignis: Geistige Schöpfung
• (wer): Heinemann, Friedrich
• Ereignis: Veröffentlichung
• (wer): Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW)
• (wo): Mannheim
• (wann): 1998

Weitere Informationen

• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/24255
• Letzte Aktualisierung: 10.03.2025, 11:45 MEZ