Comment | Stellungnahme

Situated sustainability: a research programme for conflict-affected settings and beyond

Sustainability is not a universal concept. Instead, research should acknowledge that it is anchored and expressed in many different variations of local practices, understandings and imaginations of resource use across and within significantly different contexts. Presently, the SDG discourse supersedes other understandings of sustainability. Even where it claims to be participatory, it tends to streamline visions and practices of sustainable living along SDG-principles. Researchers should seek deep engagement with stakeholders and disadvantaged communities who are not being given a voice in these processes (slum-dwellers, undocumented migrants, etc.). Researchers, policy and development practitioners should make efforts to balance the ecological bias in sustainability research and implementing practice and acknowledge insights from social science and interdisciplinary fields such as urban planning, peace and conflict research as well as forced migration/ refugee studies. Situating sustainability means co-production of knowledge through input from academics and laypersons alike in research design, analysis, dissemination and implementing change. Urban spaces represent particularly fruitful sites for research because it is here that people of different backgrounds (e.g.migrants, the forcibly displaced, established communities) mix and competing as well as complementing ideas of sustainability might coexist. By combining the three dimensions of the suggested research agenda, i.e., contextualizing sustainability, acknowledging alternative ideas beyond the SDGs and conducting transdisciplinary research, scholars could aid societal transformation that is not only ecological but will eventually call for socio-political changes towards more inclusive, equal and just societies. The research agenda of Situated Sustainability could mitigate associated ethical risks.

Situated sustainability: a research programme for conflict-affected settings and beyond

Urheber*in: Meininghaus, Esther; Mielke, Katja

Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivates 3.0 Germany

ISSN
2521-7801
Extent
Seite(n): 7
Language
Englisch
Notes
Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet

Bibliographic citation
BICC Policy Brief (10/2018)

Subject
Ökologie
Soziale Probleme und Sozialdienste
Ökologie und Umwelt
soziale Probleme
soziale Faktoren
Gewalt
Konflikt
Migration
sozioökonomische Entwicklung
sozioökonomische Struktur
nachhaltige Entwicklung
sozialer Wandel

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Meininghaus, Esther
Mielke, Katja
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC)
(where)
Deutschland, Bonn
(when)
2018

URN
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-62638-8
Rights
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln
Last update
21.06.2024, 4:27 PM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Stellungnahme

Associated

  • Meininghaus, Esther
  • Mielke, Katja
  • Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC)

Time of origin

  • 2018

Other Objects (12)