Journal article | Zeitschriftenartikel
The movement strategy in Taiwan's judicial independence reform
Judicial independence reform in Taiwan was pioneered by a group of reform-spirited judges from Room 303 of the Taichung (Taizhong) District Court, in 1993. Rather than joining the mass movement that was unfolding on the streets, the reformers formed a coalition with other judges to trigger reform from within the judiciary. The reformers appealed to the rule of law and democracy as a movement strategy for mobilization. As a result, the movement strategy turned out to be a great success, and Room 303 became the chief engine for further judicial reforms in subsequent years. However, the movement strategy in itself also presents some limitations. This paper examines why the movement strategy was successful and how its limitations eventually created problems that hinder further judicial reforms in Taiwan.
- Weitere Titel
-
Die Bewegungsstrategie in Taiwans Justizreformprozess
- ISSN
-
1868-4874
- Umfang
-
Seite(n): 125-147
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
- Erschienen in
-
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 39(3)
- Thema
-
Recht
Geschichte
Soziologie, Anthropologie
allgemeine Geschichte
Justiz
Kriminalsoziologie, Rechtssoziologie, Kriminologie
historische Analyse
Erfolg
soziale Bewegung
Taiwan
Richter
Reform
Mobilisierung
Demokratisierung
Gerichtsbarkeit
Asien
Gerichtsverfahren
Justiz
deskriptive Studie
historisch
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Wang, Chin-shou
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Deutschland
- (wann)
-
2010
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-4-3053
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 21.06.2024, 16:27 MESZ
Datenpartner
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel
Beteiligte
- Wang, Chin-shou
Entstanden
- 2010
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
The Movement Strategy in Taiwan’s Judicial Independence Reform
Judicial independence in transition
Building judicial independence in Pakistan
Explaining de facto judicial independence
Judicial independence in illiberal regimes
Rule of Law and judicial independence
Rule of law and judicial independence
Court-Packing, Judicial Independence, and Populism
When the Judiciary Undermines Judicial Independence
Judicial Independence in the EU – A Puzzle
The Economic Fallout from Curtailing Judicial Independence
War over Israel’s Judicial Independence
The Movement Strategy in Taiwan’s Judicial Independence Reform
Judicial independence in transition
Building judicial independence in Pakistan
Explaining de facto judicial independence
Judicial independence in illiberal regimes
Rule of Law and judicial independence
Rule of law and judicial independence
Court-Packing, Judicial Independence, and Populism
When the Judiciary Undermines Judicial Independence
Judicial Independence in the EU – A Puzzle
The Economic Fallout from Curtailing Judicial Independence
War over Israel’s Judicial Independence
The Movement Strategy in Taiwan’s Judicial Independence Reform
Judicial independence in transition
Building judicial independence in Pakistan
Explaining de facto judicial independence
Judicial independence in illiberal regimes
Rule of Law and judicial independence
Rule of law and judicial independence
Court-Packing, Judicial Independence, and Populism
When the Judiciary Undermines Judicial Independence
Judicial Independence in the EU – A Puzzle
The Economic Fallout from Curtailing Judicial Independence