Artikel
Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys: Comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research
Today, depending on topic, goal and budget, all kinds of sampling methods are being used, in order to collect consumer data for research in the wine business. However, it is questionable which survey method is able to generate data that does represent the entire population. A representative face-to-face survey with 2000 respondents and a telephone survey with 1000 respondents were compared with two online surveys, one based on quota sampling (2000) and the other on snowball sampling (3000) using identical questions. Due to the sampling method, three of the surveys were representative of the socio-demographic structure of the German population in terms of six demographic variables that were selected for the quota sampling. The online survey (based on the snowball sample) had large biases concerning representativeness. Regarding the behavioural characteristics of consumers, the face-to-face data delivered the best results, followed by the telephone interviews and finally the online quota survey. Face-to-face surveys still deliver the most representative results. Telephone surveys may provide a good alternative, but we would advise use of a larger sample. The online quota survey needs to be corrected, while in the case of snowball sampling, one should relinquish representativeness.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Journal: Wine Economics and Policy ; ISSN: 2212-9774 ; Volume: 2 ; Year: 2013 ; Issue: 2 ; Pages: 57-66 ; Amsterdam: Elsevier
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
- Thema
-
Consumer behaviour
Face-to-face
Online
Representativeness
Survey mode
Telephone
Wine
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Szolnoki, Gergely
Hoffmann, Dieter
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Elsevier
- (wo)
-
Amsterdam
- (wann)
-
2013
- DOI
-
doi:10.1016/j.wep.2013.10.001
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:44 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Artikel
Beteiligte
- Szolnoki, Gergely
- Hoffmann, Dieter
- Elsevier
Entstanden
- 2013
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Adaptive contact strategies in telephone and face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Face‐to‐face versus telephone‐based cognitive‐behavioral therapy for family caregivers of people with dementia
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Adaptive contact strategies in telephone and face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Face‐to‐face versus telephone‐based cognitive‐behavioral therapy for family caregivers of people with dementia
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Adaptive contact strategies in telephone and face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Face‐to‐face versus telephone‐based cognitive‐behavioral therapy for family caregivers of people with dementia