Artikel
Implications of China's innovation policy shift: Does “indigenous” mean closed?
China's government aims to become an innovation nation and promotes the development of so-called indigenous innovation. Under this paradigm of state-encouraged innovation, however, it is unclear how domestic firms organize their innovation processes. We distinguish between two strategies in that respect: closed versus open innovation. Our findings suggest that firms with closed innovation processes collaborate in close geographic distance, rely on DUI-modes of learning, and collaborations are based on guanxi. In contrast, firms with open innovation processes collaborate over large distances and rely on STI-modes of learning that are not necessarily guanxi-based. The findings help to understand the heterogeneous nature of indigenous innovation in China.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Journal: Growth and Change ; ISSN: 1468-2257 ; Volume: 51 ; Year: 2020 ; Issue: 3 ; Pages: 1124-1141 ; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
- Klassifikation
-
Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie, Anthropologie
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Losacker, Sebastian
Liefner, Ingo
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Wiley
- (wo)
-
Hoboken, NJ
- (wann)
-
2020
- DOI
-
doi:10.1111/grow.12400
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:43 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Artikel
Beteiligte
- Losacker, Sebastian
- Liefner, Ingo
- Wiley
Entstanden
- 2020