Arbeitspapier

Cooling off or Burdened? The Effects of Mandatory Waiting Periods on Abortions and Births

I implement event study and difference-in-differences research designs to measure the causal effects of mandatory waiting periods for abortions, distinguishing between "one- trip" waiting periods that allow counseling and information to be provided remotely and "two-trip" waiting periods that require two in-person appointments. The results suggest that one-trip waiting periods do not have substantial effects on abortions or births. Two-trip waiting periods are estimated to reduce abortions and delay those that still occur, increasing second trimester abortions by 19.1%, reducing resident abortion rates by 8.9%, and increasing births by 1.5%. These effects are larger for young women and for women of color. These effects also are larger in counties that are far from abortion providers and in counties with high poverty and unemployment. These findings support a "burden" rather than a "cooling-off period" interpretation of the findings.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 14434

Classification
Wirtschaft
Analysis of Health Care Markets
Health Behavior
Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
Subject
mandatory waiting periods
abortions
births

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Myers, Caitlin Knowles
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)
(where)
Bonn
(when)
2021

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:45 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Myers, Caitlin Knowles
  • Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)

Time of origin

  • 2021

Other Objects (12)