Artikel
Ranking by rating
Ranking by rating consists in evaluating the performances of items using exogenous rating functions and ranking these items according to their performance ratings. Any such method is separable: the ordering of two items does not depend on the performances of the remaining items. When performances belong to a finite set, ranking by rating is characterized by separability and a property of consistency; this characterization generalizes to the infinite case under a continuity axiom. Consistency follows from separability and symmetry or from monotonicity alone. When performances are vectors in R m + , a separable, symmetric, monotonic, continuous, and invariant method must rank items according to a weighted geometric mean of their performances along the m dimensions.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Journal: Theoretical Economics ; ISSN: 1555-7561 ; Volume: 13 ; Year: 2018 ; Issue: 1 ; Pages: 1-18 ; New Haven, CT: The Econometric Society
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
Information and Uncertainty: Other
- Thema
-
Ranking methods
separability
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Sprumont, Yves
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
The Econometric Society
- (wo)
-
New Haven, CT
- (wann)
-
2018
- DOI
-
doi:10.3982/TE2446
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:46 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Artikel
Beteiligte
- Sprumont, Yves
- The Econometric Society
Entstanden
- 2018
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Neues Ranking, alte Fehler – das »Global Go-To Think Tank«-Ranking 2013
New Ranking, Old Mistakes – The “Global Go-To Think Tanks” Ranking 2013
Credible ratings
Länder-Rankings - Komplexitätsreduktion oder Zahlenalchemie?
Personalführung im Spiegel wissenschaftlicher Rankings
Ein Meta-Ranking volkswirtschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften
Academic rankings with RePEc
Measuring patients' priorities using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in comparison with Best-Worst-Scaling and rating cards: Methodological aspects and ranking tasks
Einige Anmerkungen zum Handelsblatt-Ranking 2013
Rankings, accreditations, and international exchange students
The politics of internet freedom rankings
Country inequality rankings and conversion schemes
Neues Ranking, alte Fehler – das »Global Go-To Think Tank«-Ranking 2013
New Ranking, Old Mistakes – The “Global Go-To Think Tanks” Ranking 2013
Credible ratings
Länder-Rankings - Komplexitätsreduktion oder Zahlenalchemie?
Personalführung im Spiegel wissenschaftlicher Rankings
Ein Meta-Ranking volkswirtschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften
Academic rankings with RePEc
Measuring patients' priorities using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in comparison with Best-Worst-Scaling and rating cards: Methodological aspects and ranking tasks
Einige Anmerkungen zum Handelsblatt-Ranking 2013
Rankings, accreditations, and international exchange students
The politics of internet freedom rankings
Country inequality rankings and conversion schemes
Neues Ranking, alte Fehler – das »Global Go-To Think Tank«-Ranking 2013
New Ranking, Old Mistakes – The “Global Go-To Think Tanks” Ranking 2013
Credible ratings
Länder-Rankings - Komplexitätsreduktion oder Zahlenalchemie?
Personalführung im Spiegel wissenschaftlicher Rankings
Ein Meta-Ranking volkswirtschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften
Academic rankings with RePEc
Measuring patients' priorities using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in comparison with Best-Worst-Scaling and rating cards: Methodological aspects and ranking tasks
Einige Anmerkungen zum Handelsblatt-Ranking 2013
Rankings, accreditations, and international exchange students
The politics of internet freedom rankings