Journal article | Zeitschriftenartikel
Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding
Dieser Beitrag zur Debatte "Erfolgreich Sozialwissenschaft betreiben – Ethnographie der Karrierepolitiken einer Berufsgruppe" stellt einen Versuch dar zur Anthropologie des Drittmittelerwerbs in einer nationalen Förderungsgemeinschaft, dem Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. In diesem Versuch folge ich dem paradigmatischen Motto, das sich diese Gemeinschaft selbst gegeben hat und schon auf dem Titelblatt des "Manual for Adjudication Committee Members" (Handbuch für die Mitglieder des Entscheidungsgremiums) ausweist, welches die Regeln für die Bewertung von Anträgen bzw. für die Entscheidung über Anträge enthält, und sehe mir die launischen und politischen Prozesse des Drittmittelerwerbs von nahe an. In meinem anthropologischen Zugang bediene ich mich unterschiedlicher Gesellschaftstheorien, welche ich in der Form von das soziale Zusammenleben strukturierenden Topologien artikuliere. In meiner Repräsentation integriere ich sowohl persönliche als auch abstrahierende Perspektiven auf die sozialen Prozesse, die dem Drittmittelerwerb unterliegen und rekurriere auf die persönlichen Erfahrungen des Erfolgs und Nicht-Erfolgs, die in diesen Prozessen konstruiert werden.
- Alternative title
-
Forschungsanträge und ihre Bewertung und Entscheidung: Von Launen und Politik im Drittmittelerwerb
Evaluación y adjudicación de proyectos de investigación: Caprichos y políticas de financiamiento
- ISSN
-
1438-5627
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet
- Bibliographic citation
-
Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3)
- Subject
-
Politik
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Roth, Wolff-Michael
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (where)
-
Deutschland
- (when)
-
2002
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0203259
- Last update
-
21.06.2024, 4:27 PM CEST
Data provider
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Zeitschriftenartikel
Associated
- Roth, Wolff-Michael
Time of origin
- 2002
Other Objects (12)
Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding
Letter to the Editors of FQS. About Wolff-Michael Roth: Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding. Published in FQS 3(3)
Letter to the Editors of FQS. About Wolff-Michael Roth: Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding. Published in FQS 3(3)
Differentiating and linking politics and adjudication: The example of European electricity policy
Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study
Conventionality control of domestic law : constitutionalised international adjudication and internationalised constitutional adjudication
Conventionality Control of Domestic Law : Constitutionalised International Adjudication and Internationalised Constitutional Adjudication
Vagaries and Politics of Funding: Beyond "I Told You So"
Vagaries and Politics of Funding: Beyond "I Told You So"
Gender Effects in Research Funding : A review of the scientific discussion on the gender-specific aspects of the evaluation of funding proposals and the awarding of funding
Taxation und Adjudication
Taxation und Adjudication
Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding
Letter to the Editors of FQS. About Wolff-Michael Roth: Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding. Published in FQS 3(3)
Letter to the Editors of FQS. About Wolff-Michael Roth: Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding. Published in FQS 3(3)
Differentiating and linking politics and adjudication: The example of European electricity policy
Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study
Conventionality control of domestic law : constitutionalised international adjudication and internationalised constitutional adjudication
Conventionality Control of Domestic Law : Constitutionalised International Adjudication and Internationalised Constitutional Adjudication
Vagaries and Politics of Funding: Beyond "I Told You So"
Vagaries and Politics of Funding: Beyond "I Told You So"
Gender Effects in Research Funding : A review of the scientific discussion on the gender-specific aspects of the evaluation of funding proposals and the awarding of funding
Taxation und Adjudication
Taxation und Adjudication
Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding
Letter to the Editors of FQS. About Wolff-Michael Roth: Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding. Published in FQS 3(3)
Letter to the Editors of FQS. About Wolff-Michael Roth: Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding. Published in FQS 3(3)
Differentiating and linking politics and adjudication: The example of European electricity policy
Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study
Conventionality control of domestic law : constitutionalised international adjudication and internationalised constitutional adjudication
Conventionality Control of Domestic Law : Constitutionalised International Adjudication and Internationalised Constitutional Adjudication
Vagaries and Politics of Funding: Beyond "I Told You So"
Vagaries and Politics of Funding: Beyond "I Told You So"
Gender Effects in Research Funding : A review of the scientific discussion on the gender-specific aspects of the evaluation of funding proposals and the awarding of funding
Taxation und Adjudication