Building Common Ground: How Facilitators Bridge Between Diverging Groups in Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
1 Online-Ressource.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Building Common Ground: How Facilitators Bridge Between Diverging Groups in Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue ; day:15 ; month:2 ; year:2024 ; pages:1-26
Journal of business ethics ; (15.2.2024), 1-26
- Creator
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1007/s10551-023-05609-4
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2404230755264.729619891203
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
- 14.08.2025, 10:52 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek.
If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Grimm, Julia
- Oldenburg, Rebecca Christin von
- Reinecke, Juliane
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
ISO 26000 - reflecting the process of a multi-stakeholder dialogue: An empirical study
ISO 26000 - reflecting the process of a multi-stakeholder dialogue : An empirical study
TVET advocacy : ensuring multi-stakeholder participation
Guidebook for Facilitation of Multi-stakeholder Processes
Multi-stakeholder self-regulation mechanisms for PMSCs
Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships
Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale
Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks : Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale
The promises and pitfalls of global multi-stakeholder initiatives
Global Workers Protection: Multi-Stakeholder Initiative - eine methodische Einführung
International multi-stakeholder consensus statement on clinical trial integrity
Successfully promoting decentralisation: the potential of the multi-stakeholder approach
ISO 26000 - reflecting the process of a multi-stakeholder dialogue: An empirical study
ISO 26000 - reflecting the process of a multi-stakeholder dialogue : An empirical study
TVET advocacy : ensuring multi-stakeholder participation
Guidebook for Facilitation of Multi-stakeholder Processes
Multi-stakeholder self-regulation mechanisms for PMSCs
Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships
Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale
Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks : Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale
The promises and pitfalls of global multi-stakeholder initiatives
Global Workers Protection: Multi-Stakeholder Initiative - eine methodische Einführung
International multi-stakeholder consensus statement on clinical trial integrity
Successfully promoting decentralisation: the potential of the multi-stakeholder approach
ISO 26000 - reflecting the process of a multi-stakeholder dialogue: An empirical study
ISO 26000 - reflecting the process of a multi-stakeholder dialogue : An empirical study
TVET advocacy : ensuring multi-stakeholder participation
Guidebook for Facilitation of Multi-stakeholder Processes
Multi-stakeholder self-regulation mechanisms for PMSCs
Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships
Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale
Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks : Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale
The promises and pitfalls of global multi-stakeholder initiatives
Global Workers Protection: Multi-Stakeholder Initiative - eine methodische Einführung
International multi-stakeholder consensus statement on clinical trial integrity