Arbeitspapier

The scapegoat of heterogeneity: How fragmentation influences political decisionmaking

It is regularly stated that political fragmentation has negative effects on reforms leading to delays or even blockades. This connection is reflected in the 'weak government hypothesis' arguing that fragmented governments create higher budget deficits. Although the assumption seems logical, reviewing theoretical and empirical research on the topic does not completely support this hypothesis. In fact, only few theoretical models concentrate on the impact of fragmentation and empirical findings on the issue are ambiguous. Disentangling the effect is intricate: The definition of fragmentation has various dimensions and every model or empirical study does neglect at least some important factors. In the following I would like to shed some light on the relation and the shortcomings of recent findings. As fragmentation will have various effects on political actions it seems unjustified to generally make it the scapegoat of reform delays.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: Diskussionsbeiträge ; No. 143

Classification
Wirtschaft
Structure and Scope of Government: General
Subject
political economy
reform delay
fragmentation

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Ahlfeld, Corinna
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Volkswirtschaftliches Seminar
(where)
Göttingen
(when)
2009

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:44 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Ahlfeld, Corinna
  • Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Volkswirtschaftliches Seminar

Time of origin

  • 2009

Other Objects (12)