Stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically: an in-silico study
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2474
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically: an in-silico study ; volume:23 ; number:1 ; day:12 ; month:12 ; year:2022 ; pages:1-13 ; date:12.2022
BMC musculoskeletal disorders ; 23, Heft 1 (12.12.2022), 1-13, 12.2022
- Urheber
-
Yang, Zhi-Qiang
Cai, Ping
Li, Jing-Chi
Wang, Xian-Di
Xie, Tian-Hang
Pu, Xing-Xiao
Lin, Run
Zeng, Jian-Cheng
Song, Yue-Ming
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12891-022-06049-3
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023022121025001285181
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 14.08.2025, 11:00 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Yang, Zhi-Qiang
- Cai, Ping
- Li, Jing-Chi
- Wang, Xian-Di
- Xie, Tian-Hang
- Pu, Xing-Xiao
- Lin, Run
- Zeng, Jian-Cheng
- Song, Yue-Ming
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Vertebral bone quality score to predict cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation
Additional lateral plate fixation has no effect to prevent cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Prevalence and location of endplate fracture and subsidence after oblique lumbar interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity
Influence of coronal-morphology of endplate and intervertebral space to cage subsidence and fusion following oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Neutral hip position for the oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach increases the retroperitoneal oblique corridor
Restoration and maintenance of segment lordosis in oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis
Hounsfield unit value on CT as a predictor of cage subsidence following stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases
Meta-analysis of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lumbar interbody fusion for treating lumbar degenerative diseases
Biomechanical evaluation of different oblique lumbar interbody fusion constructs: a finite element analysis
Standalone oblique lateral interbody fusion vs. combined with percutaneous pedicle screw in spondylolisthesis
Vertebral bone quality score to predict cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation
Additional lateral plate fixation has no effect to prevent cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Prevalence and location of endplate fracture and subsidence after oblique lumbar interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity
Influence of coronal-morphology of endplate and intervertebral space to cage subsidence and fusion following oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Neutral hip position for the oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach increases the retroperitoneal oblique corridor
Restoration and maintenance of segment lordosis in oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis
Hounsfield unit value on CT as a predictor of cage subsidence following stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases
Meta-analysis of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lumbar interbody fusion for treating lumbar degenerative diseases
Biomechanical evaluation of different oblique lumbar interbody fusion constructs: a finite element analysis
Standalone oblique lateral interbody fusion vs. combined with percutaneous pedicle screw in spondylolisthesis
Vertebral bone quality score to predict cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation
Additional lateral plate fixation has no effect to prevent cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Prevalence and location of endplate fracture and subsidence after oblique lumbar interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity
Influence of coronal-morphology of endplate and intervertebral space to cage subsidence and fusion following oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Neutral hip position for the oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach increases the retroperitoneal oblique corridor
Restoration and maintenance of segment lordosis in oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis
Hounsfield unit value on CT as a predictor of cage subsidence following stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases
Meta-analysis of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lumbar interbody fusion for treating lumbar degenerative diseases
Biomechanical evaluation of different oblique lumbar interbody fusion constructs: a finite element analysis