Arbeitspapier

Avoiding the rating bounce: Why rating agencies are slow to react to new information

Rating agencies state that they take a rating action only when it is unlikely to be reversed shortly afterwards. Based on a formal representation of the rating process, I show that such a policy provides a good explanation for the empirical evidence: Rating changes occur relatively seldom, exhibit serial dependence, and lag changes in the issuers’ default risk. In terms of informational losses, avoiding rating reversals can be more harmful than monitoring credit quality only twice per year.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: Working Paper Series: Finance & Accounting ; No. 97

Classification
Wirtschaft
Banks; Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
Subject
conservatism
credit rating
rating agencies
rating migration
Kreditwürdigkeit
Informationsverhalten
Kreditrisiko
Schätzung
Theorie
Welt

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Löffler, Gunter
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften
(where)
Frankfurt a. M.
(when)
2002

Handle
URN
urn:nbn:de:hebis:30-18005
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:44 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Löffler, Gunter
  • Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften

Time of origin

  • 2002

Other Objects (12)