Arbeitspapier
The predictive power of risk elicitation tasks
This work reports an online experiment with a general-population sample examining the performance of budget-choice tasks for elicitation of risk attitudes. First, I compare the investment task of Gneezy and Potters (1997) with the standard choice- list method of Holt and Laury (2002), and evaluate their performance in terms of the number of correctly-predicted binary decisions in a set of out-of-sample lottery choices. There are no significant differences between the tasks in this sense, and performance is modest. Second, I included three additional budget-choice tasks (selection of a lottery from a linear budget set) where optimal decisions should have been corner solutions, and find that a large majority of participants provided interior solutions instead, casting doubts on subjects' understanding of tasks of this type.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Working Paper ; No. 362
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
- Subject
-
risk preferences
elicitation methods
budget sets
portfolio choices
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Garagnani, Michele
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
University of Zurich, Department of Economics
- (where)
-
Zurich
- (when)
-
2020
- DOI
-
doi:10.5167/uzh-190318
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:44 AM CET
Data provider
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Arbeitspapier
Associated
- Garagnani, Michele
- University of Zurich, Department of Economics
Time of origin
- 2020