The Consent Paradox: Accounting for the Prominent Role of Consent in Data Protection

Buchbeitrag

The concept of consent is a central pillar of data protection. It features prominently in research, regulation, and public debates on the subject, in spite of the wide-ranging criticisms that have been levelled against it. In this paper, I refer to this as the consent paradox. I argue that consent continues to play a central role not despite but because the criticisms of it. I analyze the debate on consent in the scholarly literature in general, and among German data protection professionals in particular, showing that it is a focus on the informed individual that keeps the concept of consent in place. Critiques of consent based on the notion of “informedness” reinforce the centrality of consent rather than calling it into question. They allude to a market view that foregrounds individual choice. Yet, the idea of a data market obscures more fundamental objections to consent, namely the individual’s dependency on data controllers’ services that renders the assumption of free choice a fiction.

Object Details

• Language: Englisch

Classification and Topics

• Classification: Wirtschaft
• Subject: commodification ; data protection ; discourse analysis ; informed consent ; information control ; power

Contributors, Places and Time

• Event: Geistige Schöpfung
• (who): Bergemann, Benjamin
• Event: Veröffentlichung
• (who): Springer International Publishing ; ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
• (where): Cham
• (when): 2018

Further information

• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/180107
• Last update: 10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET