NATO in U.S. policymaking and debate - an analysis: 'drawing the map' of the U.S. think; tank debate on NATO since 9/11

Arbeitspapier | Working paper

"In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks and the ensuing wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, concerns about the future role of NATO have unleashed a substantial debate among U.S. foreign policy experts and think tank analysts. In performing a qualitative content analysis, this paper comprehends and analyzes the unfolding discussion about the role of NATO currently conducted in the United States. In the policy-making process, think tanks are assumed to perform a double function. They shape the contents of a policy-relevant issue by advancing distinctive policy recommendations, and simultaneously carve out areas for consensus-building prior to the decisionmaking process. Accordingly, the first step of the analysis comprehends their approach, against which the line of argument regarding NATO as well as the policy recommendations are outlined. The prevailing issues of burdensharing and NATO enlargement furthermore provide a guideline that leads through the analysis. In a second step, major differences and overlaps between the camps are identified in order to carve out trends that are likely to prevail in future NATO politics. In the ensuing debate about NATO, four camps can be distinguished: libertarian, neoconservative, conservative, and liberal. While these camps outline distinct policy options, especially conservatives and liberals share the common objective of maintaining NATO well into the future. However, despite this commonly pursued goal, both camps remain skeptical towards NATO as a multilateral security organization and rather adopt an 'instrumentalist' view of NATO that is likely to extend into the future. In focusing on the input provided by think tanks concerning a particular policy debate, rather than the outcome of specific policies, this analysis also addresses an insufficiently-researched area of foreign policymaking and identifies implications for follow-up studies." (author's abstract)

Angaben zum Objekt

• ISSN: 1434-419X
• Umfang: Seite(n): 82
• Sprache: Englisch
• Anmerkungen: Status: Veröffentlichungsversion

Verweise und Beziehungen

• Erschienen in: Arbeitspapiere des Osteuropa-Instituts der Freien Universität Berlin, Arbeitsschwerpunkt Politik (59)

Klassifikation und Themen

• Thema: Internationale Beziehungen ; Politikwissenschaft ; Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, Sicherheitspolitik ; internationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitik ; USA ; NATO ; Sicherheitspolitik ; Verteidigungspolitik ; internationale Zusammenarbeit ; Experte ; Außenpolitik ; politische Entscheidung ; politische Entwicklung ; transatlantische Beziehungen ; Nordamerika ; Think Tank

Beteiligte, Orts- und Zeitangaben

• Ereignis: Geistige Schöpfung
• (wer): Klinkforth, Kristina
• Ereignis: Veröffentlichung
• (wer): Freie Universität Berlin, Osteuropa-Institut Abt. Politik
• (wo): Deutschland, Berlin
• (wann): 2006

Weitere Informationen

• URN: urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-439876
• Rechteinformation: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln
• Letzte Aktualisierung: 21.06.2024, 16:26 MESZ