Jihadi-Salafism in Afghanistan - beyond Taliban, al-Qaeda and Daesh: options for German foreign and development policy

Comment | Stellungnahme

Any new initiative at Islamic education sector reform must be preceded by a critical analysis of why previous reform attempts did not succeed, and religious scholars did not engage. The GoIRA should change budgeting priorities and consider allocating more resources to the construction and financing of community mosques and religious schools (madrassas) so that the field is not left to Wahhabi- and Salafi-inspired donors. External influences and funding for religious institutions regardless of sect should be cut off. The notion of Islam has increasingly become contested in Afghanistan due to the fragmentation of the political and religious landscape over the last decades. Jihadi interpretations of Islam have become widespread; Salafism and particularly militant Jihadi-Salafism is just one among several such ideologies. Additional funding lines should enable religious and non-religious civil society groups to launch grassroots and policy initiatives that could engage Afghans of all walks of life in broadbased debates about the role of religion and ideology in Afghan society. An estimated 46 per cent of the Afghan population is under 15 years of age. Given the deteriorated security situation in many parts of the country since 2009, religious education is often the only option to learn. With the increasing influence of Salafi madrassas and mosques, a growing share of youth gets exposed to potentially radical thoughts through basic education. Thus, it is of utmost importance to expand and improve technical and financial support for non-partisan basic education, vocational training and high-quality secondary and higher education for Afghanistan's youth. Critically review German foreign and development policy regarding its potential impact on radicalization and countering violent extremism since the start of German engagement in post-Taliban Afghanistan. Future policies in Afghanistan as well as in other intervention contexts should take the lessons of this reflection into account. It can benefit the design of intervention strategies not only of the German government but also other members of the international community.

Object Details

• ISSN: 2521-7801
• Extent: Seite(n): 6
• Language: Englisch
• Notes: Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: BICC Policy Brief (6/2017)

Classification and Topics

• Subject: Internationale Beziehungen ; internationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitik ; Bundesrepublik Deutschland ; Politik ; Islam ; Entwicklungspolitik ; Afghanistan ; internationale Zusammenarbeit ; Außenpolitik ; Radikalismus ; Terrorismus ; Terrorismusbekämpfung

Contributors, Places and Time

• Event: Geistige Schöpfung
• (who): Mielke, Katja ; Miszak, Nick
• Event: Veröffentlichung
• (who): Bonn International Center for Conversion (BICC)
• (where): Deutschland, Bonn
• (when): 2017

Further information

• URN: urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-62317-9
• Rights: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln
• Last update: 21.06.2024, 4:27 PM CEST