Arbeitspapier

What drives wage stagnation: Monopsony or monopoly?

Wages for the vast majority of workers have stagnated since the 1980s while productivity has grown. We investigate two coexisting explanations based on rising market power: 1. Monopsony, where dominant firms exploit the limited mobility of their own workers to pay lower wages; and 2. Monopoly, where dominant firms charge too high prices for what they sell, which lowers production and the demand for labor, and hence equilibrium wages economy-wide. Using establishment data from the US Census Bureau between 1997 and 2016, we find evidence of both monopoly and monopsony, where the former is rising over this period and the latter is stable. Both contribute to the decoupling of productivity and wage growth, with monopoly being the primary determinant: in 2016 monopoly accounts for 75% of wage stagnation, monopsony for 25%.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: IFS Working Papers ; No. 22/39

Classification
Wirtschaft
Subject
Market Power
Monopsony
Monopoly
Markdowns
Markups
Wage Stagna-tion
Concentration
HHI

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Deb, Shubhdeep
Eeckhout, Jan
Patel, Aseem
Warren, Lawrence
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS)
(where)
London
(when)
2022

DOI
doi:10.1920/wp.ifs.2022.3922
Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:41 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Deb, Shubhdeep
  • Eeckhout, Jan
  • Patel, Aseem
  • Warren, Lawrence
  • Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS)

Time of origin

  • 2022

Other Objects (12)