Arbeitspapier

Partisanship and Survey Refusal

Response rates to important surveys used in social science research have been falling precipitously over the last few decades, raising questions about the representativeness of the resulting data and the quality of evidence that comes from it. We examine how partisan preferences influence response to the Current Population Survey (CPS). Using U.S. state and metro vote shares or an individual-level model based on the longitudinal structure of the CPS, we find evidence of a political cycle in refusals, but that partisanship does not explain the surge in refusals since 2009. Evidence from a natural experiment in Tea Party support using rain on the day of the first Tea Party rally indicates the anti-Census and anti-survey rhetoric of the Tea Party did not increase refusals.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 15372

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search
Other Economic Systems: Political Economy; Legal Institutions; Property Rights; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Regional Studies
Thema
Current Population Survey
survey refusal
unit non-response
unemployment rate

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Borgschulte, Mark
Cho, Heepyung
Lubotsky, Darren
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)
(wo)
Bonn
(wann)
2022

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 10:43 UTC

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Borgschulte, Mark
  • Cho, Heepyung
  • Lubotsky, Darren
  • Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)

Entstanden

  • 2022

Ähnliche Objekte (12)