Arbeitspapier
Valuing a risky prospect less than its worst outcome: uncertainty effect or task ambiguity?
Gneezy, List and Wu [Q. J. Econ. 121 (2006) 1283-1309] document that lotteries are often valued less than the lotteries worst outcomes. We show how to undo this result.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: Jena Economic Research Papers ; No. 2007,038
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
Field Experiments
Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
- Thema
-
Risky choice
framing
experiments
task ambiguity
subject confusion
Entscheidung bei Risiko
Framing
Test
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Ortmann, Andreas
Prokosheva, Alexandra
Rydval, Ondřej
Hertwig, Ralph
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics
- (wo)
-
Jena
- (wann)
-
2007
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:43 MEZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Ortmann, Andreas
- Prokosheva, Alexandra
- Rydval, Ondřej
- Hertwig, Ralph
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics
Entstanden
- 2007
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
If the worst comes to the worst: Dictator giving when recipient´s endowments are risky
Worst-Case Portfolio Optimization : Stress Scenarios, Crash-/Default-Risk and Ambiguity
Valuing quality
False consensus and the role of ambiguity in predictions of others risky preferences
Valuing the environment
Valuing rural amenities
Are ethical and social banks less risky? Evidence from a new dataset
Are ethical and social banks less risky? Evidence from a new dataset
Are ethical and social banks less risky? Evidence from a new dataset
Risky
Forward rate bias in developed and developing countries: More risky not less rational
A simple model of trading and pricing risky assets under ambiguity: Any lessons for policy-makers?
If the worst comes to the worst: Dictator giving when recipient´s endowments are risky
Worst-Case Portfolio Optimization : Stress Scenarios, Crash-/Default-Risk and Ambiguity
Valuing quality
False consensus and the role of ambiguity in predictions of others risky preferences
Valuing the environment
Valuing rural amenities
Are ethical and social banks less risky? Evidence from a new dataset
Are ethical and social banks less risky? Evidence from a new dataset
Are ethical and social banks less risky? Evidence from a new dataset
Risky
Forward rate bias in developed and developing countries: More risky not less rational
A simple model of trading and pricing risky assets under ambiguity: Any lessons for policy-makers?
If the worst comes to the worst: Dictator giving when recipient´s endowments are risky
Worst-Case Portfolio Optimization : Stress Scenarios, Crash-/Default-Risk and Ambiguity
Valuing quality
False consensus and the role of ambiguity in predictions of others risky preferences
Valuing the environment
Valuing rural amenities
Are ethical and social banks less risky? Evidence from a new dataset
Are ethical and social banks less risky? Evidence from a new dataset
Are ethical and social banks less risky? Evidence from a new dataset
Risky
Forward rate bias in developed and developing countries: More risky not less rational