Artikel

Why Private Meanings Are Incoherent. Commentary on target article "Who Conceives of Society?" by Ernst von Glasersfeld

Open peer commentary on the target article “Who Conceives of Society?” by Ernst von Glasersfeld. Excerpt: I will focus on one crucial step in von Glasersfeld’s argumentation, viz. his view that every individual constructs his own private meanings (understood as conceptual structures or elements thereof) for linguistic expressions, so that linguistic interaction and even communication in general is based on a notion of compatibility between different speakers’ private conceptual schemes. The central question here is: “Just what does it mean that different private conceptual schemes (private meanings) are compatible, or what constitutes a viable criterion to this end?” As von Glasersfeld himself stresses twice (§28, §37), the criteria to be looked for can only be “public,” residing in properties of verbal and non-verbal actions of the interacting individuals, properties that can be sensed and processed by the participating system.

Why Private Meanings Are Incoherent. Commentary on target article "Who Conceives of Society?" by Ernst von Glasersfeld

Urheber*in: Meyer, Peter

Urheberrechtsschutz

0
/
0

Sprache
Englisch

Thema
Sprachphilosophie
Linguistik

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Meyer, Peter
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wann)
2015-06-29

URN
urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-38165
Letzte Aktualisierung
06.03.2025, 09:00 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache - Bibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Artikel

Beteiligte

  • Meyer, Peter

Entstanden

  • 2015-06-29

Ähnliche Objekte (12)