Arbeitspapier
Reconsidering the common ratio effect: The roles of compound independence, reduction, and coalescing
Common ratio effects should be ruled out if subjects' preferences satisfy compound independence, reduction of compound lotteries, and coalescing. In other words, at least one of these axioms should be violated in order to generate a common ratio effect. Relying on a simple experiment, we investigate which failure of these axioms is concomitant with the empirical observation of common ratio effects.We observe that compound independence and reduction of compound lotteries hold, whereas coalescing is systematically violated. This result provides support for theories which explain the common ratio effect by violations of coalescing (i.e., configural weight theory) instead of violations of compound independence (i.e., rank-dependent utility or cumulative prospect theory).
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: Kiel Working Paper ; No. 1930
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
- Thema
-
common ratio effect
coalescing
reduction
compound independence
event splitting
branch splitting
isolation effect
Allais paradox
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Schmidt, Ulrich
Seidl, Christian
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW)
- (wo)
-
Kiel
- (wann)
-
2014
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:45 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Schmidt, Ulrich
- Seidl, Christian
- Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW)
Entstanden
- 2014