Artikel
Evaluating apprenticeship training programs for firms
Apprenticeship training programs typically last several years and require substantial investments by training firms, largely due to the associated labor costs for participants and instructors. Nevertheless, apprentices also add significant value in the workplace. One tool to measure the costs and benefits of training for firms is employer surveys, which were first introduced in the 1970s in Germany. Such cost-benefit surveys (CBS) help to better understand a firm's demand for apprentices and to identify market failures. Therefore, CBS are an important tool for designing effective training policies.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Journal: IZA World of Labor ; ISSN: 2054-9571 ; Year: 2023
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Labor Demand
Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions
Personnel Economics: Training
- Thema
-
apprenticeship and firm-sponsored training
cost-benefit surveys
return to training investment
human capital
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Mühlemann, Samuel
Pfeifer, Harald
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)
- (wo)
-
Bonn
- (wann)
-
2023
- DOI
-
doi:10.15185/izawol.506
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:44 MEZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Artikel
Beteiligte
- Mühlemann, Samuel
- Pfeifer, Harald
- Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)
Entstanden
- 2023
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Gender and racial training gaps in Oregon apprenticeship programs
Apprenticeship training in Italy - a cost-effective model for firms?
Returns to apprenticeship training in Austria: evidence from failed firms
Returns to Apprenticeship Training in Austria: Evidence from Failed Firms
Returns to apprenticeship training in Austria: Evidence from failed firms
Returns to apprenticeship training in Austria : evidence from failed firms
Apprenticeship training in England - a cost-effective model for firms?
Recruitment and apprenticeship training
Do firms benefit from apprenticeship investments?
Do firms benefit from apprenticeship investments?
Evaluating continuous training programs using the generalized propensity score
Evaluating continuous training programs using the generalized propensity score
Gender and racial training gaps in Oregon apprenticeship programs
Apprenticeship training in Italy - a cost-effective model for firms?
Returns to apprenticeship training in Austria: evidence from failed firms
Returns to Apprenticeship Training in Austria: Evidence from Failed Firms
Returns to apprenticeship training in Austria: Evidence from failed firms
Returns to apprenticeship training in Austria : evidence from failed firms
Apprenticeship training in England - a cost-effective model for firms?
Recruitment and apprenticeship training
Do firms benefit from apprenticeship investments?
Do firms benefit from apprenticeship investments?
Evaluating continuous training programs using the generalized propensity score
Evaluating continuous training programs using the generalized propensity score
Gender and racial training gaps in Oregon apprenticeship programs
Apprenticeship training in Italy - a cost-effective model for firms?
Returns to apprenticeship training in Austria: evidence from failed firms
Returns to Apprenticeship Training in Austria: Evidence from Failed Firms
Returns to apprenticeship training in Austria: Evidence from failed firms
Returns to apprenticeship training in Austria : evidence from failed firms
Apprenticeship training in England - a cost-effective model for firms?
Recruitment and apprenticeship training
Do firms benefit from apprenticeship investments?
Do firms benefit from apprenticeship investments?
Evaluating continuous training programs using the generalized propensity score