Evaluation of the performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on the Polish Medical Final Examination
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
1 Online-Ressource.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Evaluation of the performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on the Polish Medical Final Examination ; volume:13 ; number:1 ; day:22 ; month:11 ; year:2023 ; pages:1-13 ; date:12.2023
Scientific reports ; 13, Heft 1 (22.11.2023), 1-13, 12.2023
- Creator
-
Rosoł, Maciej
Gąsior, Jakub S.
Łaba, Jonasz
Korzeniewski, Kacper
Młyńczak, Marcel
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1038/s41598-023-46995-z
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2024021211244788600619
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:29 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Rosoł, Maciej
- Gąsior, Jakub S.
- Łaba, Jonasz
- Korzeniewski, Kacper
- Młyńczak, Marcel
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Improved Performance of ChatGPT-4 on the OKAP Examination: A Comparative Study with ChatGPT-3.5
Performance evaluation of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard on the official board examination of the Japan Radiology Society
ChatGPT
GPT intern : Ergebnisse der Jahresmitgliederversammlung der GPT 2016
Evaluating GPT-4-based ChatGPT's clinical potential on the NEJM quiz
GPT-4 Turbo with Vision fails to outperform text-only GPT-4 Turbo in the Japan Diagnostic Radiology Board Examination
Comment on: ‘Comparison of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and human user performance on a practice ophthalmology written examination’ and ‘ChatGPT in ophthalmology: the dawn of a new era?’
ChatGPT in libraries
ChatGPT in Bibliotheken
30 Minuten ChatGPT
ChatGPT is bullshit
ChatGPT im Geschichtsunterricht
Improved Performance of ChatGPT-4 on the OKAP Examination: A Comparative Study with ChatGPT-3.5
Performance evaluation of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard on the official board examination of the Japan Radiology Society
ChatGPT
GPT intern : Ergebnisse der Jahresmitgliederversammlung der GPT 2016
Evaluating GPT-4-based ChatGPT's clinical potential on the NEJM quiz
GPT-4 Turbo with Vision fails to outperform text-only GPT-4 Turbo in the Japan Diagnostic Radiology Board Examination
Comment on: ‘Comparison of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and human user performance on a practice ophthalmology written examination’ and ‘ChatGPT in ophthalmology: the dawn of a new era?’
ChatGPT in libraries
ChatGPT in Bibliotheken
30 Minuten ChatGPT
ChatGPT is bullshit
ChatGPT im Geschichtsunterricht
Improved Performance of ChatGPT-4 on the OKAP Examination: A Comparative Study with ChatGPT-3.5
Performance evaluation of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard on the official board examination of the Japan Radiology Society
ChatGPT
GPT intern : Ergebnisse der Jahresmitgliederversammlung der GPT 2016
Evaluating GPT-4-based ChatGPT's clinical potential on the NEJM quiz
GPT-4 Turbo with Vision fails to outperform text-only GPT-4 Turbo in the Japan Diagnostic Radiology Board Examination
Comment on: ‘Comparison of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and human user performance on a practice ophthalmology written examination’ and ‘ChatGPT in ophthalmology: the dawn of a new era?’
ChatGPT in libraries
ChatGPT in Bibliotheken
30 Minuten ChatGPT
ChatGPT is bullshit