Arbeitspapier
Power indices when players can commit to reject coalitions
Power indices have been used to evaluate the allocation of power in a wide range of voting situations. While they use the language of game theory known measures of a priori voting power are hardly more than statistical expectations assuming the random behaviour of the players. We introduce a model where players can reject certain partnerships in cooperation. For normalised indices strategic rejection may increase power. Our notion of a strategic power index is well defined if power is measured by an index that takes only minimal winning coalitions into account.
- ISBN
-
978-615-5447-50-1
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: IEHAS Discussion Papers ; No. MT-DP - 2014/31
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Cooperative Games
Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
- Thema
-
quarrelling
rejected coalitions
a priori voting power
power indices
minimal winning coalitions
rational players
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Kóczy, László Á.
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies
- (wo)
-
Budapest
- (wann)
-
2014
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Kóczy, László Á.
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies
Entstanden
- 2014
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Strategic power indices: Quarrelling in coalitions
Power-sharing coalitions and ethnic civil war
Reformulation of Public Help Index θ Using Null Player Free Winning Coalitions
Pre-electoral coalitions and the distribution of political power
Power indices expressed in terms of minimal winning coalitions
Stable coalitions
When Are Non-Anonymous Players Negligible?
Can Capitalists Afford Recovery? Economic Policy When Capital is Power
Two-player quantum games: When player strategies are via directional choices
Bottom-Up Strategic Linking of Carbon Markets: Which Climate Coalitions Would Farsighted Players Form?
Power Players - die größten Abenteuer
A note on monotonic power indices, smaller coalitions, and new members
Strategic power indices: Quarrelling in coalitions
Power-sharing coalitions and ethnic civil war
Reformulation of Public Help Index θ Using Null Player Free Winning Coalitions
Pre-electoral coalitions and the distribution of political power
Power indices expressed in terms of minimal winning coalitions
Stable coalitions
When Are Non-Anonymous Players Negligible?
Can Capitalists Afford Recovery? Economic Policy When Capital is Power
Two-player quantum games: When player strategies are via directional choices
Bottom-Up Strategic Linking of Carbon Markets: Which Climate Coalitions Would Farsighted Players Form?
Power Players - die größten Abenteuer
A note on monotonic power indices, smaller coalitions, and new members
Strategic power indices: Quarrelling in coalitions
Power-sharing coalitions and ethnic civil war
Reformulation of Public Help Index θ Using Null Player Free Winning Coalitions
Pre-electoral coalitions and the distribution of political power
Power indices expressed in terms of minimal winning coalitions
Stable coalitions
When Are Non-Anonymous Players Negligible?
Can Capitalists Afford Recovery? Economic Policy When Capital is Power
Two-player quantum games: When player strategies are via directional choices
Bottom-Up Strategic Linking of Carbon Markets: Which Climate Coalitions Would Farsighted Players Form?
Power Players - die größten Abenteuer