Maternal and new-born mortality surveillance – Case for Kwale, Kisumu, Vihiga and Siaya

Abstract: Background and Purpose: An analysis of DHIS2 data was done and a comparison of the number of deaths reported on the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) and MoH 711, discovered that IDSR is under-utilized and inaccurate. This data analysis revealed that on average only 39% and 11% of maternal and neonatal deaths respectively, are reported as emergency events in the four counties. The aim of the study was to unearth the challenges hindering real-time submission of data and to understand the surveillance cycle in use. Methods: A purposive sampling was used to select the research participants and regions to collect the data from. The staff directly involved in the reporting of maternal and new-born deaths were targeted. They included maternity ward-in-charges, surveillance focal persons, health records personnel, and the county health management teams. The awareness of the standard operating procedures and notification policies on zero-reporting was evaluated, as well a.... https://jhia-online.org/index.php/jhia/article/view/197

Standort
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Umfang
Online-Ressource
Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Maternal and new-born mortality surveillance – Case for Kwale, Kisumu, Vihiga and Siaya ; volume:5 ; number:2 ; day:19 ; month:11 ; year:2018
Journal of health informatics in Africa ; 5, Heft 2 (19.11.2018)

Urheber
Wamiti, Doreen
Waiganjo, Peter
Wahser, Uwe
Richter-Airijoki, Heide

DOI
10.12856/JHIA-2018-v5-i2-197
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2021022209110880660370
Rechteinformation
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Letzte Aktualisierung
15.08.2025, 07:22 MESZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Beteiligte

  • Wamiti, Doreen
  • Waiganjo, Peter
  • Wahser, Uwe
  • Richter-Airijoki, Heide

Ähnliche Objekte (12)