Maternal and new-born mortality surveillance – Case for Kwale, Kisumu, Vihiga and Siaya
Abstract: Background and Purpose: An analysis of DHIS2 data was done and a comparison of the number of deaths reported on the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) and MoH 711, discovered that IDSR is under-utilized and inaccurate. This data analysis revealed that on average only 39% and 11% of maternal and neonatal deaths respectively, are reported as emergency events in the four counties. The aim of the study was to unearth the challenges hindering real-time submission of data and to understand the surveillance cycle in use. Methods: A purposive sampling was used to select the research participants and regions to collect the data from. The staff directly involved in the reporting of maternal and new-born deaths were targeted. They included maternity ward-in-charges, surveillance focal persons, health records personnel, and the county health management teams. The awareness of the standard operating procedures and notification policies on zero-reporting was evaluated, as well a.... https://jhia-online.org/index.php/jhia/article/view/197
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Maternal and new-born mortality surveillance – Case for Kwale, Kisumu, Vihiga and Siaya ; volume:5 ; number:2 ; day:19 ; month:11 ; year:2018
Journal of health informatics in Africa ; 5, Heft 2 (19.11.2018)
- Urheber
-
Wamiti, Doreen
Waiganjo, Peter
Wahser, Uwe
Richter-Airijoki, Heide
- DOI
-
10.12856/JHIA-2018-v5-i2-197
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2021022209110880660370
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:22 MESZ
Datenpartner
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Wamiti, Doreen
- Waiganjo, Peter
- Wahser, Uwe
- Richter-Airijoki, Heide