Konferenzschrift | Kongress
Special issue advances and controversies in B vitamins and choline
- Alternative title
-
Advances and controversies in B vitamins and choline
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Dimensions
-
30 cm
- Extent
-
S. 455 - 699
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
Ill., graph. Darst.
Literaturangaben
- Bibliographic citation
-
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine ; Vol. 51, No. 3
- Keyword
-
Vitamin-B-Gruppe
Cholin
Physiologe
Mangelkrankheit
Klinische Chemie
Vitamin D3
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (where)
-
Berlin, Boston, Mass.
- (who)
-
De Gruyter
- (when)
-
2013
- Contributor
- Table of contents
- Rights
-
Bei diesem Objekt liegt nur das Inhaltsverzeichnis digital vor. Der Zugriff darauf ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
11.06.2025, 1:35 PM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Konferenzschrift
- Kongress
Associated
Time of origin
- 2013
Other Objects (12)
Drone transport of biological samples: an open issue
Identification and management of spurious hemolysis: controversies, concerns and criticisms
Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together
Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories?
Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report
Adherence to recommendations and clinical practice guidelines: not an easy task
External quality assurance (EQA): navigating between quality and sustainability
Journal impact factor: the debate continues
Blood self-sampling: friend or foe?
Value-based laboratory medicine: the time is now
ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed
Component-resolved diagnostics: laboratory results are not enough
Drone transport of biological samples: an open issue
Identification and management of spurious hemolysis: controversies, concerns and criticisms
Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together
Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories?
Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report
Adherence to recommendations and clinical practice guidelines: not an easy task
External quality assurance (EQA): navigating between quality and sustainability
Journal impact factor: the debate continues
Blood self-sampling: friend or foe?
Value-based laboratory medicine: the time is now
ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed
Component-resolved diagnostics: laboratory results are not enough
Drone transport of biological samples: an open issue
Identification and management of spurious hemolysis: controversies, concerns and criticisms
Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together
Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories?
Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report
Adherence to recommendations and clinical practice guidelines: not an easy task
External quality assurance (EQA): navigating between quality and sustainability
Journal impact factor: the debate continues
Blood self-sampling: friend or foe?
Value-based laboratory medicine: the time is now
ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed