Informing the research agenda for optimizing audit and feedback interventions: results of a prioritization exercise
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2288
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Informing the research agenda for optimizing audit and feedback interventions: results of a prioritization exercise ; volume:21 ; number:1 ; day:13 ; month:1 ; year:2021 ; pages:1-8 ; date:12.2021
BMC medical research methodology ; 21, Heft 1 (13.1.2021), 1-8, 12.2021
- Urheber
-
Colquhoun, Heather L.
Carroll, Kelly
Eva, Kevin W.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Ivers, Noah
Michie, Susan
Brehaut, Jamie C.
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12874-020-01195-5
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2021030520581815666749
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:35 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Colquhoun, Heather L.
- Carroll, Kelly
- Eva, Kevin W.
- Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
- Ivers, Noah
- Michie, Susan
- Brehaut, Jamie C.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
What is the role of randomised trials in implementation science?
Linked publications from a single trial: a thread of evidence
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
What is the role of randomised trials in implementation science?
Linked publications from a single trial: a thread of evidence
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
What is the role of randomised trials in implementation science?