Essentiality without Necessity

Abstract: It is widely accepted that if a property is essential then it is necessary. Against this I present numerous counterexamples from biology and chemistry, which fall into two groups: (I) A property is essential to a genus or species, yet some instances of this genus or species do not have this essential property. (II) A property is essential to a genus, yet some species of this genus do not have this essential property. I discuss and reject four minor objections. Then I discuss in depth whether a distinction between constitutive essence and consequential essence is able to handle these counterexamples. I conclude that this distinction is better put as one between (1) the essence, which is necessary, and (2) the essential properties, which are not formally necessary. An essence of an object X is the substantial universal expressed by its real definition. An object X has a property P essentially if the property P is explanatory and non-trivial, and P follows from the essence of X.

Location
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Extent
Online-Ressource
Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Essentiality without Necessity ; volume:30 ; number:1 ; year:2016 ; pages:61-78 ; extent:18
Kriterion ; 30, Heft 1 (2016), 61-78 (gesamt 18)

Creator
Sandstad, Petter

DOI
10.1515/krt-2016-300107
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022090315075008600332
Rights
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Last update
15.08.2025, 7:35 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Associated

  • Sandstad, Petter

Other Objects (12)