Pharmacological interventions for pruritus in adult palliative care patients (review)
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 16;11:CD008320. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD008320.pub, issn: 1361-6137
- Keyword
-
Biopharmazie
Pharmakodynamik
Pharmakokinetik
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (where)
-
Freiburg
- (who)
-
Universität
- (when)
-
2017
- Contributor
-
Cochrane Deutschland
Klinik für Palliativmedizin
Medizinische Fakultät
Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
- DOI
-
10.1002/14651858.CD008320.pub3
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:bsz:25-freidok-115069
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
25.03.2025, 1:45 PM CET
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Siemens, Waldemar
- Xander, Carola
- Meerpohl, Jörg J.
- Buroh, Sabine
- Antes, Gerd
- Schwarzer, Guido
- Becker, Gerhild
- Cochrane Deutschland
- Klinik für Palliativmedizin
- Medizinische Fakultät
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik
- Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
- Universität
Time of origin
- 2017
Other Objects (12)
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin
Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey
Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice
Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: a repeated cross-sectional study
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale
Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence
Which actionable statements qualify as good practice statements In Covid-19 guidelines? : : a systematic appraisal
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin
Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey
Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice
Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: a repeated cross-sectional study
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale
Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence
Which actionable statements qualify as good practice statements In Covid-19 guidelines? : : a systematic appraisal
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin
Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey
Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice
Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: a repeated cross-sectional study
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale
Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence