Pharmacological interventions for pruritus in adult palliative care patients (review)
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 16;11:CD008320. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD008320.pub, issn: 1361-6137
- Schlagwort
-
Biopharmazie
Pharmakodynamik
Pharmakokinetik
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Freiburg
- (wer)
-
Universität
- (wann)
-
2017
- Urheber
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Cochrane Deutschland
Klinik für Palliativmedizin
Medizinische Fakultät
Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
- DOI
-
10.1002/14651858.CD008320.pub3
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:bsz:25-freidok-115069
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:54 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Siemens, Waldemar
- Xander, Carola
- Meerpohl, Jörg J.
- Buroh, Sabine
- Antes, Gerd
- Schwarzer, Guido
- Becker, Gerhild
- Cochrane Deutschland
- Klinik für Palliativmedizin
- Medizinische Fakultät
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik
- Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
- Universität
Entstanden
- 2017
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin
Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey
Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice
Surgical trials and trial registers: a cross-sectional study of randomized controlled trials published in journals requiring trial registration in the author instructions
Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin
Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey
Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice
Surgical trials and trial registers: a cross-sectional study of randomized controlled trials published in journals requiring trial registration in the author instructions
Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin
Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey
Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice
Surgical trials and trial registers: a cross-sectional study of randomized controlled trials published in journals requiring trial registration in the author instructions
Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence