- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Happy birthday: we are one year old ; volume:2 ; number:1 ; day:6 ; month:8 ; year:2013 ; pages:1-2 ; date:12.2013
Systematic Reviews ; 2, Heft 1 (6.8.2013), 1-2, 12.2013
- Creator
- Contributor
-
Stewart, Lesley
Shekelle, Paul
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/2046-4053-2-61
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201607117549
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:46 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Moher, David
- Stewart, Lesley
- Shekelle, Paul
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Reflections and aspirations: the journal after 5 years
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Reflections and aspirations: the journal after 5 years
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014