- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Happy birthday: we are one year old ; volume:2 ; number:1 ; day:6 ; month:8 ; year:2013 ; pages:1-2 ; date:12.2013
Systematic Reviews ; 2, Heft 1 (6.8.2013), 1-2, 12.2013
- Urheber
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Stewart, Lesley
Shekelle, Paul
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/2046-4053-2-61
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201607117549
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:46 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Moher, David
- Stewart, Lesley
- Shekelle, Paul
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Reflections and aspirations: the journal after 5 years
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Reflections and aspirations: the journal after 5 years
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014