The epistemic quality of expert bodies: from normative-theoretical concept to empirical measurement
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource, 1 online resource.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
The epistemic quality of expert bodies: from normative-theoretical concept to empirical measurement ; day:23 ; month:8 ; year:2023 ; pages:1-25
Acta politica ; (23.8.2023), 1-25
- Classification
-
Politik
- Creator
-
Holst, Cathrine
Christensen, Johan
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1057/s41269-023-00312-8
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023110609292371867336
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:52 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Holst, Cathrine
- Christensen, Johan
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Experts, Teachers and Their Epistemic Roles in Normative and Non-normative Domains : Comments on Dieter Birnbacher and Karen Jones & François Schroeter
Cyborgs, virtual bodies and organic bodies: theoretical feminist responses
Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension
Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension
Public epistemic authority : normative institutional design for EU law
Conciliatory democracy : exploring the normative and epistemic significance of political disagreement
Epistemic Health, Epistemic Immunity and Epistemic Inoculation
Propositional epistemic luck, epistemic risk, and epistemic justification
Co-deliberation, Joint Decision, and Testimony about Reasons : Reply to Tobias Steinig. Experts, Teachers and Their Epistemic Roles in Normative and Non-normative Domains, in: Analyse & Kritik 34, 251 – 274
COVID-19 and Biomedical Experts: When Epistemic Authority is (Probably) Not Enough
Epistemic justification and epistemic luck
Epistemic anxiety and epistemic risk
Experts, Teachers and Their Epistemic Roles in Normative and Non-normative Domains : Comments on Dieter Birnbacher and Karen Jones & François Schroeter
Cyborgs, virtual bodies and organic bodies: theoretical feminist responses
Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension
Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension
Public epistemic authority : normative institutional design for EU law
Conciliatory democracy : exploring the normative and epistemic significance of political disagreement
Epistemic Health, Epistemic Immunity and Epistemic Inoculation
Propositional epistemic luck, epistemic risk, and epistemic justification
Co-deliberation, Joint Decision, and Testimony about Reasons : Reply to Tobias Steinig. Experts, Teachers and Their Epistemic Roles in Normative and Non-normative Domains, in: Analyse & Kritik 34, 251 – 274
COVID-19 and Biomedical Experts: When Epistemic Authority is (Probably) Not Enough
Epistemic justification and epistemic luck
Epistemic anxiety and epistemic risk
Experts, Teachers and Their Epistemic Roles in Normative and Non-normative Domains : Comments on Dieter Birnbacher and Karen Jones & François Schroeter
Cyborgs, virtual bodies and organic bodies: theoretical feminist responses
Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension
Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension
Public epistemic authority : normative institutional design for EU law
Conciliatory democracy : exploring the normative and epistemic significance of political disagreement
Epistemic Health, Epistemic Immunity and Epistemic Inoculation
Propositional epistemic luck, epistemic risk, and epistemic justification
Co-deliberation, Joint Decision, and Testimony about Reasons : Reply to Tobias Steinig. Experts, Teachers and Their Epistemic Roles in Normative and Non-normative Domains, in: Analyse & Kritik 34, 251 – 274
COVID-19 and Biomedical Experts: When Epistemic Authority is (Probably) Not Enough
Epistemic justification and epistemic luck